2016-06-08 04:13:56 • ID: 1283
Microlithic Mousterian / Microlithic Middle Paleolithic
These are tiny and flat Levallois points (Fig 1; max 3 cm long, 11-15 mm thickness) from Israel. They show a "Chapeau de Gendarme" base and are essentially non retouched. One example displayed the "Concorde" characteristics, common in "Tabun B" ensembles.
Microlithism during the old world Middle Paleolithic seems to be a successful adaption of Homo sp., occurring during OIS6-3 in different habitats, climatic zones and Environments. It was not associated with the preferential use of only one raw material, but made on flint, obsidian, quartz and quartzite and Basalt.
For sure this Microlithism does not represent a „Tradition" but a versatile and flexible gesture of their makers. Tools already diversified during the end of the lower Paleolithic in the Levant and some components of the ensembles were clearly microlithic.
During the Yabroudian, at Qesem Cave tiny recycled flakes, removed from the ventral face of the parent-flake ('core-on-flake'), with little or no preparation were used as hand-held cutting tools as part of a diversified meat-processing Palaeolithic tool-kit.
In the Levant, Rust described an undated Micro-Mousterian (which is technologically a microlithic Levantine Levallois-Mousterian) from the Yabroud Rockshelter I /Syria. Level 5 (Figure 2). This level had a 20 cm thickness and contained the industry over 10 sq m was intercalated between several strata with a normal sized Levalloisian.
The Levallois points are very small (n=185) and show intentional retouches in most of the cases. They are 2-6 cm long and vary between slender and elongated and broad based triangular specimens. Interestingly Rust also described many examples of smaller blades and bladelets often with retouches and some with serrated edges (maybe created by post depositional disturbances), which he called "saws".
It remains unknown if these blades were made by a Levallois- or a specialized blade-core technology. For Rust an industry of tiny irregular microlithic tools was the most characteristic element of the ensemble (N=125; 1,5-2 cm long).
A microlithic Levallois-Mousterian has been described by H. Fleisch in the Lebanon. A similar industry is known from from the costal plain near Mt Carmel, embedded in the Kurkar-Hamra Succession** , where the specimens, that are shown in Figure 1 were found. The use of specialized cores in such ensembles has been documented, retouched tools are rare. Similar microliths have also been found in the Carmel region (Figure 3).
Microlithism during the Levantine Middle Paleolithic is not restricted to the costal zone as shown by the Microlithic Mousterian from the open-air site of Quneitra (early MIS3). The retouched items display a great variety of types (over 60), with a dominancy of Levallois flakes, single convex side scrapers, notches, denticulates and retouched flakes. This assemblage differs from other Levantine Mousterian sites in flake dimensions (shorter and thicker), very few points and naturally backed knives, and the exploitation of basalt as raw material.
Microlithic Middle Paleolithic ensembles are not rare and are known from Armenia, Greek, the Balkans, Italy, Central Europe and France. While some of these ensembles clearly refer to constraints of material supply (for example, the "Pontinian" sites, which will discussed during a later post), other do not. Situated at the crossroads between Asia Minor, the Near East and Europe, the lithic industry at Angeghakot at an altitude of 1800 m in the valley of the Vorotan (south-eastern Armenia) , mainly made from obsidian, has been identified as belonging to the Mousterian facies typical of the “Zagros-Taurus”, consisting of numerous Mousterian points, “Yerevan points”, microlithic tools, and the presence of the “truncating-facetting” technique.
In central Europe ensembles with small sized artifacts come from the last interglacial. These ensembles are usually called "Taubachian". They were usually produced by the recurrent centripetal Levallois method (Untertürkheim, Lehringen, Rabutz, Taubach),or by a discoid concept (Kulna, layer 11). Bifacial tools are virtually absent. Scrapers are common, points are sometimes present, and notched/denticulated pieces are sometimes abundant. It is hotly debated if the small artefact size was voluntary or imposed by site function and by environmental conditions.
One of the best characterized microlithic Middle Paleolithic ensembles comes from the lower strata of the Sesselfelsgrotte (Altmühltal; Bavaria) About 7 m of sedimentary deposit were excavated. An early Weichselian date is suggested for these assemblages which are typologically and technologically similar to contemporaneous western European Mousterian industries (Mousterian with micro-size tools, Ferrassie type Mousterian and Quina type Mousterian) (assemblage Ses-U-A04). These occupations took place under interstadial conditions (oxygen-isotope stade 5c and 5a) with forest and open landscape. This brings us back to the possible function of microlithic Levallois points.
Those with very small cross sectional areas/perimeters could have been served as projectile armatures. A surprising find from the Rhone region / France may underpin such assumptions. The Neronian level (ca 50 k.a.) of Grotte Mandrin is characterized by an enormous sample of almost microlithic Levallois points. At Mandrin in 80% of these small Levallois points, the thickness varies by less than 3 mm, with a thickness of between 2 and 5 mm, and with a width of between 16 and 25 mm for 60% of them. An impactological study of the Mandrin E points reveals that at least 15.5% of them were used as weapons, maybe indicative of an early bow and arrow technology.
**Kurkar is the term used in Palestinian Arabic and modern Hebrew for the rock type of which lithified sea sand dunes consist. The equivalent term used in Lebanon is ramleh. Kurkar is the regional name for an aeolian quartz sandstone with carbonate cement, in other words an eolianite or a calcarenite (calcareous sandstone or grainstone), found on the Levantine coast of the Mediterranean Sea in Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, the Gaza Stripand northern Sinai Peninsula (From: Wikipedia).
see external links
Fig 3-5: Alfred Rust: die Höhlenfunde vonJabrud (Vor- und frühgeschichtliche Untersuchungen. NF 8 / Offa-Bücher) Neumünster: Wachholtz, 1950. The picture shows Rusts Micro-Mousterian in the 5th row.
Resources and images in full resolution:
- Image: micromousterien-1021x1024.jpg
- Image: img_0079-654x1024.jpg
- Image: 2018-07-02_backdirtcarmel763x1024.jpg
- Extern Link: www.academia.edu…The_K%C5%AFlna_Level_11_some_observations_on_the_debitage_rules_and_aims._The_originality_of_a_middle_Palaeolithic_Microlithic_Assemblage_K%C5%AFlna_cave_Czech_Republic_
- Extern Link: www.persee.fr…paleo_0153-9345_2006_num_32_1_5167
- Extern Link: www.academia.edu…Mousterian_Abu_Sif_points_Foraging_tools_of_the_Early_Middle_Paleolithic_site_of_Misliya_Cave_Mount_Carmel_Israel
- Extern Link: www.academia.edu…Neanderthals_in_their_landscape